Compare how John Hogg and Scott Ludlam voted on protecting whales within Australian waters

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting whales within Australian waters” which either John Hogg or Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Hogg and Scott Ludlam on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Hogg Scott Ludlam Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting whales within Australian waters” which either John Hogg or Scott Ludlam could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Hogg Scott Ludlam Supporters vote

28th Feb 2013, 12:16 PM – Senate Motions - Whaling - Seek explanation for non-compliance with injunction

No Yes Yes

21st Nov 2012, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Seismic Survey - Harm to marine wildlife

absent Yes Yes

13th May 2010, 10:13 AM – Senate Motions - Petroleum Exploration - Protect marine wildlife of Margaret River coastline

No Yes Yes