Compare how John Hogg and Chris Evans voted on temporary protection visas

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which either John Hogg or Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Hogg and Chris Evans on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	John Hogg	Chris Evans	Supporters vote
2nd Dec 2013, 9:46 PM – Senate Regulations - Migration Amendment (Temporary Protection Visas) Regulation 2013 - Disallow	Yes	-	No
27th Jun 2013, 11:59 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Reinstatement of Temporary Protection Visas) Bill 2013 [No. 2] - Second Reading - Read a second time	No	-	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which either John Hogg or Chris Evans could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	John Hogg	Chris Evans	Supporters vote
12th Sep 2012, 11:40 AM – Senate Motions — Republic of Nauru - Coalition policies	No	No	Yes
16th Aug 2012, 5:17 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Coalition policies (b)	No	No	Yes