Compare how Fraser Anning and Tim Storer voted on protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Fraser Anning or Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning and Tim Storer on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Fraser Anning Tim Storer Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Fraser Anning or Tim Storer could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Fraser Anning Tim Storer Supporters vote

6th Dec 2018, 12:42 PM – Senate Motions - Halls Island - Make full assessment on World Heritage values

absent Yes Yes

4th Dec 2018, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity - Heed recommendations

No Yes Yes

14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine

No - Yes