Compare how Fraser Anning and Amanda Stoker voted on unconventional gas mining
Fraser Anning
Former Independent Senator for Queensland October 2018 – July 2019
Amanda Stoker
Former Liberal Party Senator for Queensland March 2018 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either Fraser Anning or Amanda Stoker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning and Amanda Stoker on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Fraser Anning | Amanda Stoker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
25th Aug 2021, 4:32 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Beetaloo Cooperative Drilling Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance |
- | No | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which either Fraser Anning or Amanda Stoker could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".