How Andrew Bartlett voted compared to someone who agrees that the Constitution should be amended to include a requirement for an Indigenous Voice to federal parliament, such as that envisaged by the Uluru Statement from the Heart

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew Bartlett on this policy.

Division Andrew Bartlett Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice in parliament” which Andrew Bartlett could have attended.

Division Andrew Bartlett Supporters vote

22nd Aug 2018, 4:48 PM – Senate Motions - Wave Hill Walk-Off - Acknowledge

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Andrew Bartlett has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.