Compare how Sam Dastyari and Stephen Parry voted on the use of strong encryption technologies

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either Sam Dastyari or Stephen Parry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Dastyari and Stephen Parry on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam Dastyari	Stephen Parry	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either Sam Dastyari or Stephen Parry could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sam Dastyari	Stephen Parry	Supporters vote
23rd Feb 2016, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Develop technology	No	No	Yes
14th Nov 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Motions - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Reference - Surveillance	No	No	Yes