How Marise Payne voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding to private bodies that provide certain services otherwise provided by the government, such as education and health (for example, private universities)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Marise Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marise Payne on this policy.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Marise Payne could have attended.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote

18th Jun 2015, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Extend funding to private universities and colleges

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marise Payne was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.