Compare how John Faulkner and Christopher Back voted on more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which either John Faulkner or Christopher Back could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner and Christopher Back on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Faulkner Christopher Back Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which either John Faulkner or Christopher Back could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Faulkner Christopher Back Supporters vote

1st Dec 2016, 1:40 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (War Crimes) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - More scrutiny

- No Yes

4th Sep 2014, 12:52 PM – Senate Defence Legislation Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

No No Yes