Compare how John Faulkner and Kate Lundy voted on tobacco plain packaging

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either John Faulkner or Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner and Kate Lundy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Faulkner Kate Lundy Supporters vote

10th Nov 2011 – Senate Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which either John Faulkner or Kate Lundy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division John Faulkner Kate Lundy Supporters vote
no votes listed