Compare how Helen Coonan and Ruth Webber voted on increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Helen Coonan or Ruth Webber could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Helen Coonan and Ruth Webber on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Helen Coonan Ruth Webber Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Helen Coonan or Ruth Webber could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Helen Coonan Ruth Webber Supporters vote

24th Nov 2009, 3:41 PM – Senate Border Protection Committee of Cabinet Meeting - Order - Produce documents

absent - Yes

27th Aug 2008, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - MV Tampa: Seventh Anniversary - Inquiry into immigration detention

absent - Yes

10th May 2007, 10:17 AM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Information requested

No No Yes

2nd Mar 2006, 11:37 AM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional References Committee - Refer

No Yes Yes