Compare how Brian Burston and Scott Ludlam voted on increasing access to medicinal cannabis products

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which either Brian Burston or Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brian Burston and Scott Ludlam on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Brian Burston Scott Ludlam Supporters vote

13th Jun 2017, 1:10 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

Yes Yes Yes

11th May 2017 – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

No Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which either Brian Burston or Scott Ludlam could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Brian Burston Scott Ludlam Supporters vote

13th Jun 2017, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Vote on disallowance again

Yes Yes Yes