Compare how Brian Burston and Anthony Chisholm voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Brian Burston or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brian Burston and Anthony Chisholm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Brian Burston Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

7th Feb 2023, 5:15 PM – Senate Motions - Instrument of Designation of the Republic of Nauru as a Regional Processing Country

- Yes No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which either Brian Burston or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Brian Burston Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

8th Mar 2023, 10:01 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Evacuation to Safety) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

- No Yes

15th Feb 2018, 11:56 AM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - End offshore detention

No No Yes

20th Jun 2017, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Close Nauru and Manus Is. detention centres

No No Yes