Compare how Brian Burston and David Leyonhjelm voted on Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which either Brian Burston or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brian Burston and David Leyonhjelm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Brian Burston	David Leyonhjelm	Supporters vote
16th Aug 2018, 11:38 AM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	absent	No	Yes
1st Dec 2016 – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which either Brian Burston or David Leyonhjelm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Brian Burston	David Leyonhjelm	Supporters vote
no votes listed