We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Carr voted on re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
How Bob Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Bob Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Carr on this policy.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2013, 11:08 AM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Bob Carr could have attended.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bob Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.