We can't say anything concrete about how Arthur Sinodinos voted on the right to protest
How Arthur Sinodinos voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect the right of its citizens to protest against its laws, policies and decisions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos on this policy.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2018, 6:25 PM – Senate National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Freedom of speech |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the right to protest” which Arthur Sinodinos could have attended.
| Division | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Arthur Sinodinos was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.