Compare how Arthur Sinodinos and Kate Lundy voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which either Arthur Sinodinos or Kate Lundy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Arthur Sinodinos and Kate Lundy on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Arthur Sinodinos Kate Lundy Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which either Arthur Sinodinos or Kate Lundy could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Arthur Sinodinos Kate Lundy Supporters vote

21st Mar 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland: Native Title - Adani Indigenous Land Use Agreement

absent - Yes

3rd May 2016, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Budget - Radioactive Waste

No - Yes

20th Mar 2014, 12:20 PM – Senate Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Delegation) Regulation 2013 - Regulations and Determinations - Disallow the Regulation

No Yes Yes

14th Sep 2009, 6:19 PM – Senate Native Title Amendment Bill 2009 - In Committee - Proof of continuity

- No Yes