We can't say anything concrete about how Zed Seselja voted on an Australian bill of rights
How Zed Seselja voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should introduce an Australian bill of rights either as a piece of legislation or as part of the Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Zed Seselja on this policy.
Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Zed Seselja could have attended.
Division | Zed Seselja | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2019, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Racism - Introduce an Australian Charter of Rights |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Zed Seselja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.