How Nick Champion voted compared to someone who agrees that in light of the threat of climate change, the federal government should make as rapid a transition to renewable energy as possible

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a fast transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy” which Nick Champion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Champion on this policy.

Division Nick Champion Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a fast transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy” which Nick Champion could have attended.

Division Nick Champion Supporters vote

19th Oct 2021, 4:25 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Implementing the Technology Investment Roadmap) Regulations 2021 - Disallow

absent No

15th Jun 2021, 6:01 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Australian Renewable Energy Agency Amendment (2020-2021 Budget Programs) Regulations 2021 - Disallowance

absent No

15th Jun 2021, 5:56 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Australian Renewable Energy Agency Amendment (2020-2021 Budget Programs) Regulations 2021 - Disallowance

absent No

11th Feb 2020, 5:44 PM – Representatives Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Cross-Boundary Greenhouse Gas Titles and Other Measures) Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Carbon reducing tech

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Nick Champion has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.