How Pauline Hanson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put a time limit on how long asylum seekers can be detained while their claims for asylum are being processed

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for putting a time limit on immigration detention” which Pauline Hanson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pauline Hanson on this policy.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for putting a time limit on immigration detention” which Pauline Hanson could have attended.

Division Pauline Hanson Supporters vote

13th May 2021, 1:46 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent No

13th May 2021, 1:35 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Clarifying International Obligations for Removal) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pauline Hanson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.