Compare how Sharman Stone and Michael Johnson voted on the Intervention in the Northern Territory

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Intervention in the Northern Territory” which either Sharman Stone or Michael Johnson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharman Stone and Michael Johnson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Michael Johnson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Intervention in the Northern Territory” which either Sharman Stone or Michael Johnson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Michael Johnson Supporters vote

2nd Sep 2008, 5:46 PM – Representatives Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and Other Legislation Amendment (Emergency Response Consolidation) Bill 2008 - Consideration in Detail - Maintain the strength of the Intervention

Yes Yes Yes

1st Sep 2008, 8:26 PM – Representatives Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and Other Legislation Amendment (Emergency Response Consolidation) Bill 2008 - Second Reading - Ban pornography completely and retain permit system

No No No