Compare how Sharman Stone and Peter Garrett voted on re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which either Sharman Stone or Peter Garrett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharman Stone and Peter Garrett on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Peter Garrett Supporters vote

15th May 2013, 1:43 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill

No Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which either Sharman Stone or Peter Garrett could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Peter Garrett Supporters vote

15th May 2013, 1:36 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process

Yes No No