Compare how Sharman Stone and Kirsten Livermore voted on increasing fishing restrictions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which either Sharman Stone or Kirsten Livermore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sharman Stone and Kirsten Livermore on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Kirsten Livermore Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which either Sharman Stone or Kirsten Livermore could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Sharman Stone Kirsten Livermore Supporters vote

13th Sep 2012, 4:59 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill

No Yes Yes

13th Sep 2012, 4:31 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

No Yes Yes