We can't say anything concrete about how Brian Mitchell voted on Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency
How Brian Mitchell voted compared to someone who agrees that the AU Government must address the causes and consequences of climate change as a matter of urgency with explicit proactive policies and direct & indirect actions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Brian Mitchell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brian Mitchell on this policy.
| Division | Brian Mitchell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Brian Mitchell could have attended.
| Division | Brian Mitchell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jul 2019, 9:26 PM – Representatives Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Climate crisis |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Brian Mitchell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.