How Julia Gillard voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Julia Gillard could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Julia Gillard on this policy.

Division Julia Gillard Supporters vote

15th May 2013, 1:43 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Julia Gillard could have attended.

Division Julia Gillard Supporters vote

15th May 2013, 1:36 PM – Representatives Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Remove re-registration process

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Julia Gillard was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.