Compare how Keith Pitt and Natasha Griggs voted on restricting foreign ownership

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which either Keith Pitt or Natasha Griggs could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Keith Pitt and Natasha Griggs on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Keith Pitt Natasha Griggs Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which either Keith Pitt or Natasha Griggs could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Keith Pitt Natasha Griggs Supporters vote

7th Dec 2020, 4:39 PM – Representatives Foreign Investment Reform (Protecting Australia's National Security) Bill 2020 and another - Second Reading - Foreign acquisition

Yes - No

6th Mar 2014, 12:37 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Read a third time

Yes Yes No

6th Mar 2014, 12:01 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to bill

Yes Yes No

6th Mar 2014 – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes No