Compare how Keith Pitt and Steven Ciobo voted on increasing the price of subsidised medicine

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the price of subsidised medicine” which either Keith Pitt or Steven Ciobo could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Keith Pitt and Steven Ciobo on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Keith Pitt Steven Ciobo Supporters vote

16th Jul 2014, 6:36 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Third Reading — Read a third time

Yes Yes Yes

16th Jul 2014, 6:05 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Consideration in Detail — Agree to the bill

Yes Yes Yes

16th Jul 2014, 4:30 PM – Representatives National Health Amendment (Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 2014 — Second Reading — Read a second time

Yes Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the price of subsidised medicine” which either Keith Pitt or Steven Ciobo could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Keith Pitt Steven Ciobo Supporters vote
no votes listed