We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Butler voted on Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency
How Mark Butler voted compared to someone who agrees that the AU Government must address the causes and consequences of climate change as a matter of urgency with explicit proactive policies and direct & indirect actions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Mark Butler could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Butler on this policy.
| Division | Mark Butler | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Mark Butler could have attended.
| Division | Mark Butler | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jul 2019, 9:26 PM – Representatives Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Climate crisis |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mark Butler has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.