Compare how Harry Quick and Paul Neville voted on stem cell research
Harry Quick
Former Independent Representative for Franklin March 1993 – October 2007
Paul Neville
Former National Party Representative for Hinkler March 1993 – August 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should allow certain types of stem cell research, including human embryo research
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stem cell research” which either Harry Quick or Paul Neville could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Quick and Paul Neville on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Harry Quick | Paul Neville | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2006, 6:17 PM – Representatives Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stem cell research” which either Harry Quick or Paul Neville could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Harry Quick | Paul Neville | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2006, 7:29 PM – Representatives Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Offence of using precursor cells |
absent | Yes | No |