Compare how Mal Brough and Natasha Griggs voted on letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Mal Brough or Natasha Griggs could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mal Brough and Natasha Griggs on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mal Brough Natasha Griggs Supporters vote

10th Sep 2015, 1:29 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

Yes Yes No

10th Sep 2015, 1:20 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes Yes No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Mal Brough or Natasha Griggs could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Mal Brough Natasha Griggs Supporters vote
no votes listed