Compare how Duncan Kerr and Paul Neville voted on speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)
Duncan Kerr
Former Australian Labor Party Representative for Denison July 1987 – August 2010
Paul Neville
Former National Party Representative for Hinkler March 1993 – August 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote to speed things along by supporting motions to 'put the question' (known as 'closure' or 'gag' motions), which require Parliament to immediately vote on a question rather than debating it any further
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either Duncan Kerr or Paul Neville could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Duncan Kerr and Paul Neville on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for speeding things along in Parliament (procedural)” which either Duncan Kerr or Paul Neville could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Duncan Kerr | Paul Neville | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |