Compare how Duncan Kerr and Tony Smith voted on increasing competition in bulk wheat export

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which either Duncan Kerr or Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Duncan Kerr and Tony Smith on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Duncan Kerr Tony Smith Supporters vote

31st Oct 2012, 6:25 PM – Representatives Wheat Export Marketing Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

- No Yes

4th Jun 2008, 10:45 AM – Representatives Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 - Third Reading - Read a third time

Yes Yes Yes

4th Jun 2008, 10:27 AM – Representatives Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which either Duncan Kerr or Tony Smith could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Duncan Kerr Tony Smith Supporters vote

31st Oct 2012, 6:15 PM – Representatives Wheat Export Marketing Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Decline to read a second time

- Yes No

7th Dec 2006, 7:58 PM – Representatives Wheat Marketing Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Independent review

Yes No Yes