We can't say anything concrete about how Tony Smith voted on Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency
How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the AU Government must address the causes and consequences of climate change as a matter of urgency with explicit proactive policies and direct & indirect actions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Government direct and indirect action on climate change as a matter of urgency” which Tony Smith could have attended.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jul 2019, 9:26 PM – Representatives Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Climate crisis |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tony Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.