Compare how Matt Keogh and Ted O'Brien voted on increasing penalties for breach of data

Photo of Matt Keogh

Matt Keogh

Australian Labor Party Representative for Burt since July 2016

Voted consistently for increasing penalties for breach of data
Photo of Ted O'Brien

Ted O'Brien

Liberal Party Representative for Fairfax since July 2016

Voted consistently against increasing penalties for breach of data

How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase penalties for breach of data by for-profit companies that have been contracted by the government to store sensitive information or to provide services to citizens

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Matt Keogh or Ted O'Brien could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Keogh and Ted O'Brien on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Matt Keogh Ted O'Brien Supporters vote

11th Oct 2016, 6:20 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Penalties for data breach

Yes No Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Matt Keogh or Ted O'Brien could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Matt Keogh Ted O'Brien Supporters vote
no votes listed