We can't say anything concrete about how Philip Ruddock voted on expanding Medicare-funded dental care
How Philip Ruddock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should expand Medicare-funded dental care
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for expanding Medicare-funded dental care” which Philip Ruddock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Philip Ruddock on this policy.
| Division | Philip Ruddock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Sep 2007, 9:17 AM – Representatives Health Insurance Amendment (Medicare Dental Services) Bill 2007 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for expanding Medicare-funded dental care” which Philip Ruddock could have attended.
| Division | Philip Ruddock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Philip Ruddock was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.