We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget Archer voted on the Register of Members' Interests
How Bridget Archer voted compared to someone who agrees that MPs and Senators should have to disclose to the public any money they receive which could constitute, or be seen to constitute, a conflict of interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Register of Members' Interests” which Bridget Archer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget Archer on this policy.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Oct 2021, 5:08 PM – Representatives Committees — Privileges and Members' Interests Committee; Reference |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Register of Members' Interests” which Bridget Archer could have attended.
| Division | Bridget Archer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget Archer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.