How Kate Thwaites voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be more scrutiny or oversight of the actions and powers of Australian intelligence and law enforcement agencies, including the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for more scrutiny of intelligence services & police” which Kate Thwaites could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Thwaites on this policy.

Division Kate Thwaites Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for more scrutiny of intelligence services & police” which Kate Thwaites could have attended.

Division Kate Thwaites Supporters vote

10th Dec 2020, 10:57 AM – Representatives Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020 - Consideration in Detail - The 'Howard safeguard'

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Thwaites was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.