How Bob Katter voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take national action to increase housing affordability so that all Australians have the chance to buy their own home

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing housing affordability” which Bob Katter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Katter on this policy.

Division Bob Katter Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing housing affordability” which Bob Katter could have attended.

Division Bob Katter Supporters vote

28th Feb 2024, 5:34 PM – Representatives Help to Buy Bill 2023 and Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bills

absent Yes

14th Sep 2023, 12:01 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Measures No. 1) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendment

absent Yes

14th Sep 2023, 11:49 AM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendment

absent Yes

16th Feb 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives National Housing Supply and Affordability Council Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Regional Australia and critical infrastructure

absent No

15th Feb 2023, 5:39 PM – Representatives Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes Yes

27th Nov 2019, 1:05 PM – Representatives Treasury Laws Amendment (Reducing Pressure on Housing Affordability Measures) Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Housing affordability

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Bob Katter has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.