We can't say anything concrete about how Cathy O'Toole voted on tighter means testing of family payments
How Cathy O'Toole voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Cathy O'Toole could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Cathy O'Toole on this policy.
| Division | Cathy O'Toole | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Cathy O'Toole could have attended.
| Division | Cathy O'Toole | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2017, 6:01 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2017, 5:42 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2017, 5:37 PM – Representatives Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Don't agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Cathy O'Toole was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.