We can't say anything concrete about how Tony Smith voted on increasing funding for vocational education
How Tony Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for the vocational education sector, which includes TAFEs, apprenticeships and traineeships
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Tony Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tony Smith on this policy.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for vocational education” which Tony Smith could have attended.
| Division | Tony Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Jun 2020, 7:12 PM – Representatives National Skills Commissioner Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged |
absent | No |
10th Feb 2020, 7:10 PM – Representatives Student Identifiers Amendment (Enhanced Student Permissions) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support vocational education |
absent | Yes |
10th Feb 2020, 5:46 PM – Representatives Trade Support Loans Amendment (Improving Administration) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Support vocational education |
absent | Yes |
24th Oct 2019 – Representatives Education Legislation Amendment (Tuition Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2019 and two others - Second Reading - State of TAFE and universities |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tony Smith was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.