How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be required to seek the consent of local communities before selecting new sites for radioactive waste disposal

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.

Division Clare O'Neil Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for community right to say no to nuclear waste disposal sites” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.

Division Clare O'Neil Supporters vote

11th Jun 2020, 12:54 PM – Representatives National Radioactive Waste Management Amendment (Site Specification, Community Fund and Other Measures) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clare O'Neil was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.