How Josh Frydenberg voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase penalties for breach of data by for-profit companies that have been contracted by the government to store sensitive information or to provide services to citizens

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which Josh Frydenberg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Josh Frydenberg on this policy.

Division Josh Frydenberg Supporters vote

11th Oct 2016, 6:20 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Penalties for data breach

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which Josh Frydenberg could have attended.

Division Josh Frydenberg Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Josh Frydenberg was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.