How Bill Shorten voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon pricing mechanism

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a carbon price” which Bill Shorten could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Shorten on this policy.

Division Bill Shorten Supporters vote

14th Jul 2014, 5:55 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill as amended

No No

14th Jul 2014, 5:11 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2014 and related bills — Second Reading — Read a second time

No No

26th Jun 2014, 5:49 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 [No. 2] and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent No

21st Nov 2013, 12:22 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 and related bills - Second reading - Read a second time

No No

11th Oct 2012, 9:06 AM – Representatives Clean Energy Amendment (International Emissions Trading and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - Second reading - Motion to abolish the carbon price

No No

12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time

Yes Yes

12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Defer commencement of the carbon price

No No

11th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a carbon price” which Bill Shorten could have attended.

Division Bill Shorten Supporters vote

21st Nov 2013, 1:18 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 - Motion to Dissent from Ruling

Yes Yes

11th Oct 2012, 9:13 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Amendment (International Emissions Trading and Other Measures) Bill 2012 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes

11th Oct 2012, 9:58 AM – Representatives Clean Energy Amendment (International Emissions Trading and Other Measures) Bill 2012 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time

Yes Yes

30th May 2012, 7:32 PM – Representatives Clean Energy (Excise Tariff Legislation Amendment) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes

30th May 2012, 7:28 PM – Representatives Clean Energy (Customs Tariff Amendment) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes

30th May 2012, 7:25 PM – Representatives Clean Energy Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time

Yes Yes

12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bills

Yes Yes

12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy (Fuel Tax Legislation Amendment) Bill 2011 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Amendment

No No

12th Oct 2011 – Representatives Clean Energy Bill 2011 and related bills - Consideration in Detail - Government amendments

Yes Yes

15th Sep 2011 – Representatives Carbon Tax Plebiscite Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time

No No

12th May 2011 – Representatives Private Members' Business - Carbon Pricing - Carbon price essential

Yes Yes

How "voted consistently for" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 7
MP voted against policy 0% 25 0
MP absent 50% 25 1
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 11
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 0

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 242.5 / 255 = 95%.

And then this average agreement score