How Patrick Secker voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Patrick Secker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Patrick Secker on this policy.

Division Patrick Secker Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Patrick Secker could have attended.

Division Patrick Secker Supporters vote

21st Mar 2013, 12:38 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment Bill 2013 - Consideration in Detail - Bilateral agreements

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Patrick Secker was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.