How Brendan Nelson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Brendan Nelson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brendan Nelson on this policy.

Division Brendan Nelson Supporters vote

5th Jun 2008, 5:51 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 — Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

5th Jun 2008, 5:49 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Read a second time

absent Yes

5th Jun 2008, 5:46 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) Bill 2008 — Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

5th Jun 2008, 5:43 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Read a second time

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Brendan Nelson could have attended.

Division Brendan Nelson Supporters vote

5th Jun 2008, 5:36 PM – Representatives National Fuelwatch (Empowering Consumers) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Keep motion to read a second time unchanged

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Brendan Nelson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.