How Richard Marles voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not put asylum seeker children into immigration detention and should release all children now in detention

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for removing children from immigration detention” which Richard Marles could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Marles on this policy.

Division Richard Marles Supporters vote

22nd Oct 2014, 5:12 PM – Representatives Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for removing children from immigration detention” which Richard Marles could have attended.

Division Richard Marles Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Richard Marles was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.