We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew McLachlan voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water
How Andrew McLachlan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the protection of Australia's fresh water resources, including its river and groundwater systems
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew McLachlan on this policy.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2023, 10:15 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2023, 9:39 AM – Senate Water Amendment (Restoring Our Rivers) Bill 2023 - Keep bill items as they are; held environmental water |
No | Yes |
25th Feb 2020, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Protect water |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Andrew McLachlan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.