We can't say anything concrete about how Claire Chandler voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions
How Claire Chandler voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Claire Chandler could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Claire Chandler on this policy.
Division | Claire Chandler | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Claire Chandler could have attended.
Division | Claire Chandler | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
8th Mar 2023, 10:01 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Evacuation to Safety) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2020, 4:13 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Resettlement |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Claire Chandler was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.