Photo of Lucy Gichuhi

We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on decreasing ABC and SBS funding

How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease funding for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.

Division Lucy Gichuhi Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing ABC and SBS funding” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.

Division Lucy Gichuhi Supporters vote

14th Nov 2018, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Australia Network - Reinstate and award funding

absent No

19th Jun 2018, 4:28 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Cuts and privatisation

absent No

19th Jun 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Restructure and calls for privatisation

absent Yes

9th May 2018, 7:02 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional and Small Publishers Innovation Fund) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Media diversity

absent No

26th Mar 2018, 8:39 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Reinstate SBS revenue shortfall

absent No

13th Sep 2017, 10:20 PM – Senate Broadcasting Legislation Amendment (Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017, Commercial Broadcasting (Tax) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Against non-statutory review

No No

10th May 2017, 5:41 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - Reduce funding

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Lucy Gichuhi has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.