How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be more scrutiny or oversight of the actions and powers of the Australian Defence Force (ADF), both within Australia and overseas

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.

Division Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.

Division Skye Kakoschke-Moore Supporters vote

1st Dec 2016, 1:40 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (War Crimes) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - More scrutiny

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Skye Kakoschke-Moore was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.