How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.

Division Anthony Chisholm Supporters vote

11th Sep 2019, 4:10 PM – Senate Committees - Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.